Well, here it is: my first post written inside a courthouse. Yes, loyal readers, I write you from within the wearying bureacratic soul-suck that is...Jury Duty. Where, as it turns out, they offer free computer access. But not much else. So, since I have a minimum of three more hours to wait and I've already read most of the interesting magazines lying around (well "interesting" is a stretch. The most recent thing here came out in March. This morning I read an issue of Harpers that was published during the Bush administration. Really.)
What to talk about? Well since I've spent the last hour reading every web site I can think of to kill time, I guess the news is a place to start.
Oh--first--jury duty itself. This is my second time to be called to Jury Duty in LA. The first time was at a different courthouse, one that sent most of us home by 10 AM. I mistakenly assumed, receiving this recent summons, that I would be going to the same courthouse; in fact, however, I ended up at a court where they make you wait around all day. I've been here since 8:30. It's 1:30 now. So far not one person in the room has been called. I'm hopeful they'll start to release some of us soon. Though since I know they won't I guess 'hopeful' isn't the word. What, then? Praying, maybe.
Back to the news. It's sort of dispiriting, isn't it? How about bullet points on the big issues.
-Can we all agree to be collectively outraged about J McCarthy being given a full time job The View? I realize daytime talk is not exactly the Oxford debating society, but at least most of their regularly-scheduled idiots aren't offering opinions that might actually cause immediate harm. Stay-at-home moms are the meat and potatoes of a show like the The View. McCarthy espouses dangerous nutcase theories that lead to under-vaccination and, in some cases, death. Yet ABC gives her a public platform in front of the very audience who she threatens the most. Appalling.
-My take on George Zimmerman.... (as if the world needed more people talking about him). The man is pathetic and foolish; he's like The Office's Dwight Schrute--only with a gun. In a state that allows him to shoot people. Still, I think that what he did was legal, at least according to Florida law. The issue at stake--as many in the media have pointed out--is laws that allow "Stand Your Ground" justifications for the use of deadly force. (A media meme has taken hold, recently, suggesting that "Stand Your Ground" actually played no role in his conviction; for a refutation of same go here.) Florida laws don't seem particularly reasonable to me, and though I'm not qualified to pronounce on the subject, I don't see a need for "Stand Your Ground" type laws in general. Though much about that night will never be known, Zimmerman seems to me to have been something more than an unsuspecting, innocent victim (the fact that he ignored the 911 dispatcher's order to say in his car and instead went back after Martin is telling). At the very least, I believe he helped to provoke the violence that lead to Martin's death--but without any witnesses it's obviously impossible to say what actually happened.
My gut reaction to this kind of news is to say that nobody anywhere in the US should be allowed to carry a pistol (except cops). I know that's a simplistic solution to a complicated set of problems. Still, as ever in America, guns make things worse. (As the mob was to the Sopranos, so guns are to America; they serve to turn every problem, disagreement or tension into a matter of life and death). Any problem that exists in American society is made worse--deadlier and more horrible--because of the ready access of guns. The Newton killings, for example, or the shooting in Colorado, the core problem, in both instances, is our difficulties in dealing with the mentally ill. But guns make the problem worse. In China, by contrast, mentally unstable people go on knifing sprees; people are hurt, and it isn't pleasant, but it's nothing like as bad as it is here. There, the potential for mass violence is siginificantly absent, because guns are so much harder to come by.
But I digress.
("But it's all there in the letter." "Verbatim.")
I would say, as a sidenote, that I think the prosecution overcharged Zimmerman. If they'd have gone for ONLY manslaughter, giving up on 2nd degree murder, they might have got a conviction. Also worth remembering; the Florida crime scene people made serious errors in handling the evidence. Had they bagged Martin's bloody clothes correctly, DNA evidence might have been more conclusive. Yet more proof that "CSI" and "Crime Scene" are the most arrant of fictions.
-I'm working now on a Modern Family spec. Then, back to a play. A different one, I think.
-It's been a tough summer.
-I'm getting back into tennis, trying to get back into serious shape. For most of last year my main exercise was walking. That allowed me to listen to books on tape, and for that reason I relished it (I "read" all of Trollope's Barsetshire Novels while walking around the Hazeltine/Sherman Oaks park last year. Wonderful.) But walking, while relaxing, doesn't soup up the metabolism like I now think I need. It also take time from the day. So back to running, jumping rope, and--for now--tennis against the backboard. Lessons may resume shortly.
-Okay, time to go read the January 29 issue of National Review. Really.
-Addendum: Jury Service ended at 3:30. Now, to nap.